By: Isaac Ross, Student Voices writer
Comparisons
with Brutus's slaying of Caesar have been rife. Michael Gove's eleventh-hour
decision to withdraw his support for Boris Johnson's leadership bid and
announce his own bid, thus taking a sizeable amount of MP's supporting Boris
with him, was viewed as an act of Machiavellian betrayal; not out of place in
the current turbulent political scene yet still stunning in its barefaced
ruthlessness.
"Et
tu Michael?"
With
Boris now the foreign secretary - a masterstroke of an appointment with
'box-office Boris' able to amplify the British brand abroad like no other - the
tables have turned somewhat with Gove relegated to the back benches with his
integrity called into question.
One
of the great reforming voices of the Conservative Party, Gove has been a vital
utensil of intellect inside David Cameron's government since 2010 and was seen
as as someone with remarkable acumen during his prominent role in the Vote
Leave campaign where he passionately delivered his aspiration to leave the EU
in his characteristically composed manner.
Synonymous
with polite, courteous but above all noble behaviour, the backstabbing of Boris
is aberrational for a man whom even his fiercest of critics would acclaim as
well-mannered and seemingly loyal. What exactly were Gove's motives remain at
large and a matter of curiosity for many, not least those who were and remain
of the opinion that Gove would make a very capable prime minister, despite his
protests to the contrary that he lacks the required je ne sais quoi.
Indeed,
the prospects of a Boris-Gove one-two at the top of British politics with Gove
assuming the role of Chancellor of the Exchequer to Boris's function as prime
minister excited many in the Conservative ranks particularly the Tory
grassroots. Gove was seen as giving essential intellectual buttress and
vitality to the Boris campaign amid accusations that Johnson wasn't
sufficiently political or serious.
With
claims of laziness and organisational carnage against Boris still in
circulation from his time as a journalist, one wonders whether this was perhaps
a factor which sowed the seeds of doubt in Michael Gove's head and convinced him
he would be better off running himself to guarantee the instalment of a
prominent Vote Leave campaigner in Number 10. But not implausible is the case
that this might have been an insidious plot or an impulsive power-hungry
desire. We may never find out.
Despite
Boris pulling out of the race to become Tory leader, Gove's gamble failed. He
had lost his traction amongst Tory MP's and had sullied his reputation with
what was seen as an act of treachery by those in the Boris camp and beyond,
whilst those close to David Cameron were still unable to forgive Gove for not
only campaigning for Vote Leave during the referendum campaign but more
significantly, perpetually attacking Cameron's record in government most
notably in regard to immigration. Cameron and Gove, who are longstanding
friends, have had an uneasy relationship ever since.
Even
amongst Conservative party members, where in direct contrast to sentiments
across the country, Gove had always remained popular and was riding upon a
stallion of admiration after his impressive role in the Brexit campaign,
support was said to be dwindling.
Gove's
demotion to the back benches does not mean we have seen the end of him however.
Theresa May is reported to have told Gove that she is not confirming that there
is 'no way back' for him or that he will 'never serve in the government' but
'loyalty is something on people’s minds' and it would perhaps help if Gove
'could demonstrate that loyalty from the back benches'. Indeed under different
circumstances, Gove would likely be tasked with leading the Brexit discussions
and negotiations with the EU; a job given to David Davis instead.
Indeed,
it is my belief that Gove will be back; a too significant intellectual bastion
to be perennially jettisoned. Particularly with the Tories advancing along the
avenue of 'compassionate conservatism' under Theresa May, Gove's reforming
experience and innovation will be needed.
However,
most would deem it improbable as to whether he can now be seen as a future
prime minster. He has acquired infamy with the most spectacular political
assassination of recent times; an act which has ultimately backfired.
With
Boris now in a prominent role within the government, a role which can only
nurture his talents and inflate his reputation, he will be once again the
bookies favourite to succeed Theresa May when such a time arrives.
Gove
will eventually return to the forefront of domestic politics. But he will
remain forever free of the burden of running the country.
Gove will return but his prime ministerial prospects are finished
Reviewed by Student Voices
on
19:11
Rating:
This seems a sophomoric attempt at political analysis. Embarrassing really. Essentially a poorly plagiarised version of the past month's Daily Telegraph.
ReplyDeleteI agree with the above. The author hides his shallow understanding of the political world behind a sea of synonyms. A particularly glaring error was how he used the much used box office line in relation to Boris, when it's currently being used to describe Phil Hammond.
ReplyDeleteHahaha. The problem with this site is that it gives a voice to loons like him.lol
ReplyDeleteThis was intended as less of an opinion column than a general article, perhaps the title suggests otherwise. I utterly reject accusations of plagiarism as I have not viewed the Telegraph at all other than the quotations from Theresa May. Similarly, I had not been aware of the phrase 'box-office' being used to describe Phillip Hammond - Isaac Ross
ReplyDeleteGet rid of these uneducated morons who clearly sift through mainstream media and then dress it up as their 'own' opinion. Ban him.
ReplyDeleteThe criticisms of this article are hugely over blown. It's well written and will I am sure be proved more or less correct.
ReplyDelete