Society is a system. Institutions and people have to
co-operate to run society’s everyday activities smoothly. We need to do more
with less. The failure of one institution isn’t always the fault of the
institution itself. Instead, it is the failure of an innumerable institutions
to co-operate. That in short and simple words is the view of certain sociologists,
namely functionalists.
Systems consist of component parts which must work
together to help the broader system operate smoothly (O’Byrne, 2013). Moreover,
each component has a designated and unique function.
In other words, people and institutions must fulfil their
roles adequately. The tasks of one institution should not be transferred to
another institution. The transfer of liability results institutions becoming
under-resource and overloaded.
Recent permanent exclusion figures for primary and
secondary schools illustrate the above theoretical argument.
The permanent exclusion rate is up for primary and
secondary school pupils in England. Around 6,700 students were excluded in 2015-16, a
number which has been on the rise since 2012-13. Everyone will surely agree
that these are dreadful numbers. However, not everyone agrees on the source of
the problem.
Where does the blame lie? Whose responsibility is it to
discipline children and teach them how to behave around other people and
towards other people? These are the questions which cause a lot of division
among policy experts and the public.
Some argue that it is the teachers’ responsibility to
instil good behaviour in their students. It is argued that children today spend
a considerable amount of time at schools and therefore it is the responsibility
of staff at schools to educate children on the right behaviour - seems logical,
right? No!
Irrespective of how much time children spend at school,
it is illogical and impractical to place additional responsibilities on
teachers. At a time when the UK’s education system is overloaded and
under-resourced, it is inconceivable to place further expectations on teachers.
Individuals who misbehave in lessons have a profound and
negative impact on everyone’s learning in class rooms. Far too much time is
unfortunately spent to discipline children and not enough on teaching the
curriculum.
If schools are not suited for this job, then whose role
is it?
Families are liable for this role. Much more specifically
it is parents who are to blame for children’s poor behaviour.
The cause of this increasingly bad behaviour of children
is the failing family system. The job parents ought to be doing is being
carried out by schools. Therefore, schools are overloaded with responsibility
and simultaneously underfunded as they do not have the necessary means to carry
out other people’s duty. Schools don’t lack funding due to austerity (as Labour
and Liberal Democrats want us to believe); instead, educators are being asked
to do someone else’s job in addition to their own responsibilities. Both
Primary and Secondary school staff are being asked to fill the gaps of parents’
incompetence.
‘The family becomes a social problem when it presents a
threat to the dominant values and interest of society’ (Punch et al, 2013). In
the 21st century, some families exert a direct and negative impact
on schools as they have to do the job of families, especially, parents in
particular.
In contrast, it wouldn’t be accurate to blame parents
entirely for mishap of their children. Based on the premise that society is a
system, there are also a range of other factors which influence young people’s
behaviour. It is an issue plagued by a number of institutions including the
main stream media and social media.
Nonetheless, the negative impact of the media can be
reduced if parents curtail access to certain websites at home. It is parents
who should fulfil their responsibility to educate their children on good
behaviour. It is parents who must teach their children the right values. Households
can lessen the intrusion of negative values on their children’s behaviours if
they are willing to it.
The dismal behaviour of pupils can be altered, only if
parents take the liability of their children’s poor manners.
Muhammed Hussain is a writer for Student Voices and a student at the University of Roehampton.
Who is to Blame for Students' poor Behaviour? | Muhammed Hussain
Reviewed by Unknown
on
16:19
Rating:
No comments:
Share your views here! But read our Comment Policy first, found on the about page.