By: Dan Baker, Student Voices writer
For those who do not speak french, the label attached to the
AK-47, translates as "this shoots" and the latter "satire",
with a play on words as they are both pronounced the same in french.
I have often been faced with debates regarding Religion and
it usually ends in offense. Religious sensitivity is a social epidemic, and it
is infringing on our civil liberties, freedom of speech, and the values of the
free society in which we live. It seems in the 21st Century, people are
determined to be offended or even seeking to be offended. I believe that people
really need to develop a thicker skin when it comes to faith, and accept it as
a subject which is not sacrosanct.
The reason I am so vocal with regards to religion is as
follows. Supernatural beliefs only create unnecessary fear and worry in the
minds of those who are most impressionable. I find it unfathomable that I
should be expected to keep quiet as children are taught lies about how the world
began, how old the earth is and that if they touch themselves they are going to
an imaginary place to suffer and die for eternity. To quote Bertrand Russell
"I do not myself feel that any person who is really profoundly humane can
believe in everlasting punishment." I concur with this statement, magical
and superstitious thinking is something from the dark ages, and not something
we should see in modern society. Most dangerously, Christianity and Islam
promote the idea of a second life. The idea that death is not only not a bad
thing but that there is a better place to go after, an almost suicidal
poisonous belief system which is diffused into society. Why shouldn't I have
the right to publicly and directly question those indoctrinating their children
with such a treacherous belief system.
Do not fear, there is a silver lining to my right to offend,
you have the right to disagree with me. It's magnificent. Freedom of speech
means one can say or write anything one chooses. If we could only say things that
did not offend, the true essence of freedom of expression is infringed and the
principle of the liberty is withdrawn. The same right which protects people’s
rights to say things I find objectionable, for example when Donald Trump says
he would like to ban muslims from the United States, is precisely what protects
my right to object to his nonsensical and xenophobic comments .
“We are avenging Mohammed!” the islamic extremists shouted
as they conducted their heinous crimes against the satirical magazine Charlie
Hebdo in Paris on January 7th 2015. The terrorists violently opposed the
liberties of a free world, the ability to poke fun and satirise anything. One
thing you have to bare in mind, when reading comments saying Charlie Hebdo
provoked the fatal attacks by drawing and mocking the Prophet Mohammed, is that
words do not kill people. The artists and editors of Charlie Hebdo did not
storm a mosque in the middle east because they were offended by the islamic
laws and practices. They realised that they have the right to be offended, and
maybe upset, but not to start shooting people. The scrutiny of religion or
philosophy is a key foundation to our society. To put it simply, you have the
right to dislike the way I dress, but you do not have the right to tell me or
force me to change the way I dress. I have the right to mock your religious
beliefs, your political beliefs, your ideas, and even you, but you have the
right to be offended by this. This is the definition **tolerance**.
Anyone who believes we should not be able to offend is
essentially supporting a totalitarian regime where we can not say a bad thing
against the supreme leader. Replace the supreme leader with a subject which is
'offensive' and we have essentially created a state rather like North Korea.
Furthermore, I find it hard to be schooled on morals by people who support this
idea of some absolute power deciding what I am permitted to say. If any opinion
legitimately expressed can be ousted on the premise that it is an offense or an
insult to an individual, this is the foundation of a new and terrifying regime
of tyranny and censorship. The notion that a democracy can function without the
freedom to offend is preposterous. Open discours is certainly going to lead to
offense. Polite conversation is not constructive in legislation or decision
making. People can scream, shout and ferociously debate but they don't shoot at
each other, this leads to a functioning tolerant yet pluralist society.
I like to think that everyone is capable of thinking for
themselves and formulating their own opinions. By allowing someone to believe
something which is false, you are conducting the greatest injustice. I believe
rational debate and discours can **enlighten** the public. It is not by
believing in magic or superstition that humanity has made such advances in
technology or science. Here is something everyone should bare in mind the next
time someone offends you. Shut up, be quiet and respond with a valid argument.
Developing a thicker skin is part of life, because being offended will happen
throughout life. The right to say such things is called freedom of speech, and
it is a vital piece of the free society in which we live.
I have the right to offend you, and your God
Reviewed by Student Voices
on
12:35
Rating:
No comments:
Share your views here! But read our Comment Policy first, found on the about page.